I, Hacker

Hungry hungry macros 
« Back to blog

RMS is a traitor to the Free Software community

Yesterday I read about a comment from RMS at Software Freedom Day in Boston. He referred to Miguel
de Icaza as "basically a traitor to the Free Software community".
Sorry, but this is too much, even for him.

RMS was a driving force early on and is responsible in large part for
the open source movement. Since then, I believe he's done far more to
harm the community than he's done to help it. From silliness like the
famegrab that is the term GNU/Linux, to the attempts to fight
Tivoization of Linux with the GPLv3 (notice that the Linux kernel is
still GPLv2? This isn't an accident.), he's shown himself to be out
of touch with the needs and desires of the community as a whole.

At a time when Free Software is bigger than ever and becoming more and
more important in the commercial space, the last thing we need is a
'leader' who actively fights against anything that doesn't fit his
exact model of freedom. At some point, you have to take a step back
and realize that blind idealism does nothing but stop forward
movement.

Miguel: Keep up the great work. From Gnome to Mono, you've shown an
active interest in improving the Free Software desktop and haven't
hesitated to make change where you thought it was necessary.
RMS: Start thinking objectively about the effect your words have on
the community. I respect you for sticking to your guns, but your
position requires you to see the big picture too.

- Cody Brocious (Daeken)

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments (6)

Sep 26, 2009
andrun said...
I like my salaried hackers pronouncing they "don't want to make any money." Any thoughts on this plug ugly elitism in your proud proffer?
Sep 26, 2009
Meepmeepmeep said...
@jessecrockett: Can you say that in English?
Sep 27, 2009
Prashanth said...
"RMS was a driving force early on and is responsible in large part for
the open source movement." RMS never been responsible for open source.
Sep 28, 2009
maht said...
1) is RMS anyone's leader?
2) In this case he's right. MdI was an MS reject that brought the nightmare of IDL to GNOME, the only reason he got his hands on the codebase was because KDE was kicking their arse in the Windows knockoff competition and the rest of the team needed a morale boost.
Sep 30, 2009
andrun said...
For the record, I'd prefer to delete my comment.

Leave a comment...

 
Got an account with one of these? Login here, or just enter your comment below.
Posterous-login    twitter